Claap vs Loom: Which Async Video Tool Wins
Claap vs Loom comes down to one question: do you want async video plus AI conversation intelligence, or the simplest, cheapest screen recorder? Claap records live calls, writes AI notes and updates your CRM, while Loom keeps a tight focus on fast, polished video messaging. We compared both on price, features, AI and best-fit use case so you can choose without a two-week trial of each.
Last updated: April 2026. Prices are entry paid plans billed annually, checked against each vendor’s pricing page. Confirm current figures before you buy.
Claap vs Loom: the quick answer
Claap wins for sales and revenue teams that need AI call notes and CRM automation; Loom wins for simple, high-quality async video at a lower price. Claap does more but costs more and has a steeper learning curve, while Loom does one job cleanly and is faster to roll out across a company.
| Factor | Claap | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | 10 videos, 300 min | 25 videos, 5-min cap |
| Entry paid plan | ~€30/user/mo (Pro) | ~$12.50/user/mo (Business) |
| AI meeting recorder | Yes (Zoom, Meet, Teams) | No (screen recording only) |
| CRM automation | Yes (Business plan) | No |
| Best for | Sales and revenue teams | Simple async video at scale |
Source: Claap and Loom pricing pages, verified April 2026. Claap prices are in euros, Loom in US dollars; figures are approximate. Figures are approximate, confirm before purchase.
For the full feature detail on each tool, see our Claap review. The sections below compare them factor by factor.
What does each tool do?
Claap is a conversation-intelligence platform that records async video and live calls, then adds AI notes, transcripts and CRM automation. Loom is a video-messaging tool that records your screen and camera and shares a link fast, with AI limited to titles, summaries and chapters.
The core difference is scope. Loom is deliberately narrow and does async video better than almost anyone. Claap is broad, covering the same async video but stretching into live-call recording and sales tooling that Loom never attempts. As Wikipedia describes it, Loom is a video-messaging tool for work, now part of Atlassian.
Claap vs Loom: pricing compared
Loom is the cheaper tool, starting around $12.50 per user per month on Business against Claap’s roughly €30 per user per month on Pro. Both offer free plans, but they cap differently: Loom limits videos to five minutes each, while Claap caps total minutes and video count.
Price alone favours Loom, but the tools are not doing the same job at those prices. Claap’s Pro seat includes an AI meeting recorder and advanced notes that Loom simply does not offer at any tier. For a like-for-like on plan structure, see our Claap pricing guide.
Which has better AI features?
Claap has deeper AI: it records live meetings, transcribes in 99 languages, writes structured summaries with action items, and on Business drafts CRM updates and follow-up emails. Loom’s AI is lighter, covering auto titles, summaries, chapters and filler-word removal on its Business plus AI tier.
- Claap live-call capture: A bot joins Zoom, Meet and Teams calls automatically, which Loom cannot do since it only records your own screen.
- Claap CRM automation: Business plans write call outcomes into Salesforce and HubSpot, a sales feature entirely absent from Loom.
- Loom editing polish: Loom’s filler-word and silence removal make async messages tighter, an area where its focused AI shines.
- Loom simplicity: Loom’s AI needs no setup, so non-technical teams get value on day one without configuring integrations.
If AI conversation intelligence is the goal, Claap is far ahead. If you just want cleaner async videos, Loom’s narrower AI is enough and simpler to use.
Which is better for async video?
For pure async video, Loom holds a slight edge on speed and polish, since that is its entire product. Recording, trimming and sharing feel instant, and viewers watch without an account. Claap matches the core workflow and adds timestamped comments and transcripts, but carries more interface around it.
Teams that only send screen recordings will find Loom faster to adopt company-wide. Teams that want those recordings searchable and summarised will prefer Claap despite the extra weight. The right pick depends on whether async video is the whole job or just one part.
Want AI notes and CRM sync, not just video?
Try Claap Free →Free plan available, no credit card required.
Which suits sales teams better?
Claap is the clear choice for sales teams because it records live calls, updates the CRM and coaches reps, none of which Loom does. Loom can share a recorded demo or a personalised outreach video, but it stops there and has no notion of a deal, a pipeline or a call transcript.
A sales team choosing Loom would still need a separate AI notetaker and CRM tool, which erases its price advantage. For revenue teams, Claap consolidates that stack into one seat, which is exactly the case its Business plan is built for.
Which is easier to use?
Loom is easier to use because it does one thing. New users record and share within minutes and there is little to configure. Claap has more surface area, with meeting bots, integrations and CRM settings, so it takes longer to set up and train a team on.
That trade is the whole comparison in miniature: Loom is simpler because it is narrower, and Claap is more complex because it does more. Match the tool to how much you actually need it to do rather than to which onboarding feels lighter.
Claap vs Loom: which should you choose?
Choose Claap if you run sales or customer calls and want AI notes, transcripts and CRM automation in one tool. Choose Loom if you want fast, polished async video for updates, demos and onboarding at the lowest price and simplest rollout.
The choice is not which tool is better, but whether you need conversation intelligence or simple video messaging, since each wins its own job.
— GrowthStackKit, Claap Review
If neither fits perfectly, our Claap alternatives guide lists other tools that split the difference between video messaging and full revenue intelligence.
Frequently asked questions
The 12 most-asked questions about Claap vs Loom.
Is Claap better than Loom?
Claap is better for sales teams that need AI call notes and CRM automation, while Loom is better for simple, cheap async video. Neither is universally better; the right pick depends on whether you need conversation intelligence.
Is Claap cheaper than Loom?
No. Loom is cheaper, starting around $12.50 per user per month against Claap’s roughly €30 per user per month. Claap costs more because it bundles live-call recording, AI notes and CRM features.
Does Loom record Zoom and Teams calls?
No. Loom records your own screen and camera, not live meetings. Claap sends a bot to join Zoom, Google Meet and Teams calls and returns a full recording, transcript and summary.
Which has better AI, Claap or Loom?
Claap has deeper AI, including live-call transcription, structured summaries and CRM automation. Loom’s AI is lighter, focused on titles, summaries, chapters and filler-word removal for async videos.
Does Claap have a free plan like Loom?
Yes. Claap’s free plan allows 10 videos and 300 total minutes per user, while Loom’s free plan allows 25 videos capped at 5 minutes each. Both suit testing before you pay.
Is Loom or Claap better for sales?
Claap is better for sales because it records calls, updates the CRM and coaches reps. Loom can send outreach or demo videos but has no call recording, transcripts or pipeline features.
Is Loom or Claap easier to use?
Loom is easier because it does one thing: record and share video. Claap has more features and integrations, so it takes longer to set up and train a team on, but it does more once configured.
Can Claap replace Loom?
Yes for most teams. Claap covers the same async screen-and-camera recording as Loom, then adds AI notes and call recording. Teams that value Loom’s speed and simplicity may still prefer it for pure video.
Does Loom integrate with CRMs?
Loom offers general integrations but no CRM auto-complete. Claap writes call outcomes into Salesforce and HubSpot on its Business plan, which is the main sales-workflow gap between the two tools.
Is Loom owned by Atlassian?
Yes. Atlassian acquired Loom, which now sits within its product suite. Claap is an independent company focused on conversation intelligence and async video for revenue teams.
Which is better for remote product teams?
Both work well. Loom is faster for quick screen updates, while Claap adds transcripts and searchable summaries that help larger teams find context later. Choose by whether you need those notes.
Where can I see full Claap pricing?
Our Claap pricing guide breaks down every plan and AI credit limit, and the full Claap review covers features in depth.